Author: Nichelle Barra Page 6 of 91

52 Ancestors Week 6: Favorite Name

Favorite names! Personally, my favorite name is one that is unique and the person used it in all their records instead of a nickname. This is a feeling I’m sure most genealogists share! (Although there is something satisfying about being able to correctly identify which John Smith is your John Smith.)

Unique names is something I am familiar with, given my own name. I get lots of comments about my own name – and LOTS of corrections throughout my life. Lots of people would correct it for me, assuming my mother or I had spelled it wrong. No, thank you. It is Nichelle. Just like Michelle, but with an N. There’s a whole spiel that goes with giving someone my name. And although my mom has watched a lot of Star Trek (I got my nerd genes from her, which I am very proud of), I am sadly not named after Nichelle Nichols. I once had someone (a complete stranger) insist that I was, which was interesting. But in reality, my mom had a friend who used Nichelle as a middle name for her daughter and my mom thought it was pretty. That’s the story!

Several of my favorite names in my family tree turn out to be Biblical names, but such ones that go beyond the Mary and Joseph – Hezekiah is an example. Another is the subject for this post: Tryphena (Hockey) Stock, my 4th great-grandmother.

I had to look up how to pronounce it even, just to be certain!

A quick Google search shows that Tryphena is a Biblical name from Romans 16:12 and it was about two women who worked hard in the name of God.  I am completely unfamiliar with that story/reference, so feel free to correct me or give more details!

Tryphena is also my last English immigrant. Well, technically her daughter, Hannah (my 3rd great-grandmother) would be considered that, but they all came to America as a family.

I had a hard time finding Tryphena in the 1841 census for England. I believe she is the child called Mary found in the household of Job and Jane Hockey. ((“1841 England Census,” database, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 11 Feb 2018), entry for Job Hockey (age 35), Westbury, Somerset; citing the National Archives, class HO107, piece 962, book 12, folio 10, page 15; Wetbury Parish, ED 21.))

That Mary matches what I do have – she’d be about 13 at that time and she’s in the same area I find her later. There is also a baptism record for a “Iziphena” Hockey, which is likely a transcription error for Tryphena. There it states she was baptized 28 Oct 1827 and was born 4 Sept 1827 to parents Job and Jane Hockey in Shepton Mallet. ((FreeBMD, “Basic Search,” database, FreeREG (http://www.freereg.org.uk : accessed 11 Feb 2018), parish register baptism entry for Iziphena Hockey, 28 Oct 1827, Shepton Mallet, Somerset; citing St. Peter and Paul, reg no. 1768. )) So perhaps her middle name was Mary? Maybe that was easier than her name? I can understand if that was the case!

Then there is her marriage in the England & Wales Marriage Index. She married Forest Stock in Wells, Somerset County, England by 1849. ((“England & Wales, Civil Registration Marriage Index, 1837-1915,” database, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 11 Feb 2018), marriage entry for Tryphena Hockey [groom not identified]; citing Somerset County, Fourth Quarter 1849. vol. 10, page 793. Also see “England & Wales, Civil Registration Marriage Index, 1837-1915,” database, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 11 Feb 2018), marriage entry for Forest Stock [bride not identified]; citing Somerset County, Fourth Quarter 1849. vol. 10, page 793.)).

Although the index doesn’t indicate who they are marrying, the fact that they have the same volume and page number is a good sign. That and the fact that they are together in the 1851 census for England in Westbury, with their daughter Hannah (my 3x great-grandmother).  There, Tryphena is indicated as being born in Shepton Mallet in Somerset, which is less than 6 miles away from Wells, where the two married (I had to Google that). ((“1851 England Census,” database, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 11 Feb 2018), entry for Tryphena Stock (age 23), Westbury, Somerset; citing The National Archives, class HO107, piece 1934, folio 90, page 14; Wells registration district, ED 5, household 59.))

By 1860, the family has moved to Michigan, and from their five year son William who was born in Michigan, they had been there since 1855 at the latest. Why they came is still a bit of a mystery. I haven’t really noticed any family around, but I haven’t searched that hard for siblings at this point either. ((1860 U.S. Census, Macomb County, Michigan, population schedule, Clinton, page no. 383, dwelling 2787, family 2917,  Forest Stock and family; image, Ancestry.com(http:www.ancestry.com : accessed 11 Feb 2018); citing NARA microfilm publication M653, roll 553.))

She was just 32 in 1860. A few years later, with the start of the Civil War, Forest joins to fight with Michigan.

Never to return.

Which is a story for another time. But for Tryphena, she’s now a widow at 37. I turn 36 this year and that is a haunting reality for me. I don’t have children and couldn’t imagine suddenly be the sole provider for 6 children, all under 16.

She never remarries either. She was still a young woman (in my eyes at least), and a husband probably would have helped. I still need to research her siblings to see if any of them followed her to America, but it could be that there wasn’t family around. Just her and her kids.

By 1873, at the age of 46, she passed away. She died in Lenox, Macomb County, Michigan. ((“Michigan, Deaths and Burials Index, 1867-1995,” database, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 11 Feb 2018), entry for Mary Stock, 30 May 1873; Family History Library “Michigan Deaths and Burials, 1800-1995,” FHL Film Number 979574. )) There’s so much more to her story that I still want to find out! What happened to her siblings, why the move to Michigan, and then what did she do after Forest’s death?

Friday Finds for 9 Feb 2018

Blogs/Articles

Media and Education

New and Updated Resources

52 Ancestors Week 5: In the Census

This is a bit late as we’re already on week 6! However, I had a tough time trying to figure out what to grab for this one.

For the most part, I don’t have anything really interesting in the census records – to others anyway. I am always delighted to find new family members or identify neighbors as future in-laws, etc. But I wanted a good story!

I did eventually find one that I feel tells an interesting, and sad, story. It’s the 1930 census of 2nd great-grandparents: John and Edna (LaValley) Stalmacher. I found the family just fine in the 1930 census of Saginaw, Michigan((1930 U.S. Census, Saginaw County, Michigan, population schedule, Carrollton, enumeration district (ED) 73-10, sheet 11A, dwelling 109, family 234,  John Stalmacher and family; image, Ancestry.com (http:www.ancestry.com : accessed 6 Feb 2018); citing NARA microfilm publication T626, roll 1021)):

All looks fine and dandy there. John, the head of the household rents the home and doesn’t live on a farm. He’s 39, married at 20, and can read and write. He’s from Poland as were his parents and speaks Polish. He immigrated in 1905, is a naturalized citizen by now, and speaks English. He works as a machinist for an oven factory, not a veteran, and hasn’t been out of work.

His wife, Edna, is 36, married at 17, born in Michigan as were her parents, and doesn’t work.

There are two children listed on this page: Gerald, a son of 18 years old (no work), and Ellen, a daughter, 15 years old and attending school. There’s a small notation off to the side to see the last page of the census, line 95. Apparently their youngest daughter, Priscilla, was left off at the time the family was filled out. So she’s listed here: 6 years old at the time. Sure, that’s unusual, but there are many on that list and we don’t know who gave the census information. It could have been a simple mistake.

But there’s more here, of course. I like to research siblings as well as my ancestor. Especially since finding John before he married has been difficult. Sometimes kids stay with aunts/uncles and I was hoping to look for other relatives that way.

Unexpectedly, I find another 1930 census for Gerald. Odd. He’s listed with a lot of people and right next to his name is a telling word: inmate. Going to the top of the census I see: Michigan Reformatory.

Gerald is listed here, as an inmate. He matches my Gerald: 18, born in Michigan as was mother, father born in Poland. He even works on machines at a shirt factory. ((1930 U.S. Census, Ionia County, Michigan, population schedule, Easton Township, Michigan Reformatory, ED 34-13, sheet 18A, line 47,  Gerald Stalmacher; image, Ancestry.com (http:www.ancestry.com : accessed 6 Feb 2018); citing NARA microfilm publication T626, roll 992)) But um… how could he be there AND at home? Of course, he did technically live at home as his permanent residence, even if he was incarcerated at the time. Or was this a new person altogether?

There wasn’t much else in records to share if this was the right guy or not, so I turned to my grandpa and his siblings. After all, this was their uncle. The response was a curious, “Oh, right. Well we just don’t talk about that.” kind of response. Which of course, intrigued me further.

This was the first real black sheep I had found in the family and I was a bit excited about it! Much to my mom’s confusion (and my aunt’s). The Library of Michigan actually holds records from that time for the Michigan Reformatory. So I emailed to get more information and they confirmed they have someone by that name! I drove there as soon as I could and hit what I consider to be a jackpot!

This was definitely my guy and not someone else with a different name. It also shows just an interesting history for him. He didn’t go just once at 18 – no, he went at 18 in 1930, then at 24 in 1936, then at 33 in 1945, then one last time at 58 in 1970.

In 1930, it was for breaking and entering and larceny. The record shows the term was for 3.5 -15 years (he only served 3.5 years). He was technically 17 at the time and it does give a description of him, but no picture: dark blonde hair, light blue eyes, high and full forehead, medium large nose, medium lips, round chin, medium build, fair complexion, dark beard, etc. It also noted scars that he had. ((Gerald Stalmacher Prisoner Index Card, reg. no. 21503 (1930). Michigan Reformatory, Jackson, Michigan, copy supplied by Michigan Archives to Nichelle Barra, June 2013))

In 1936, he was caught for breaking and entering once more and was discharged 13 years later.

1945 it was for uttering and publishing – which looks to be counterfeiting. He was discharged 8 years later.

Lastly was 1970 for unlawful driving away auto. This record hurts my heart a bit more. It mentions he is partially deaf, separated from his wife, and currently lived in the city’s rescue mission. Meaning he was homeless. ((Gerald Stalmacher Prisoner Index Card, no. D-59442, Michigan Department of Corrections, Lansing, Michigan, copy supplied by Michigan Archives to Nichelle Barra, June 2013.))

As is often the case, finding one thing leads to more questions. Genealogy isn’t just about records, it’s about telling a story. And this one feels half told. I would love to know why this happened. Why did one sibling go this way and the others another way? What was their home life like? Social life? Why, at 58, was he living in a homeless shelter? How did this affect the family? Why did he continue doing these things? What, in other words, happened here? There are so many variables and so many parts to this story that records can’t touch. Sadly, there’s no one left for me to ask about this. My grandfather and his siblings only knew he existed and used to be a cook for a time and that yes, he was often in trouble with the law. There’s so much left unsaid here!

So many questions…

 

 

 

Friday Finds 2 Feb 2018

Blogs/Articles

Media and Education

New and Updated Resources

Page 6 of 91

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén